The VENT Thread

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby Tessablue » Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm

I'm really not interested in interviewing them to appease someone on the internet who has no actual interest in the answers. Both are highly independent people who are self-employed, and both would be unambiguously dead right now. That's it, that's the story.
Tessablue
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:29 am
Location: Boston

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby stark » Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:19 pm

Tessablue wrote:I'm really not interested in interviewing them


Obviously excuse me, I thought you might know right off the top of your head.

Tessablue wrote:to appease someone on the internet who has no actual interest in the answers.


wrong again.

Tessablue wrote: Both are highly independent people who are self-employed, and both would be unambiguously dead right now. That's it, that's the story


Gosh, well since you brought them up, and they're not dead, maybe you can share the reason(s) why they never had insurance in prior years without violating any HIPAA laws?
I've found it easier to tear up tickets at 8/1 instead of 8/5.
stark
 
Posts: 3782
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:55 am
Location: SoCal

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby starrydreamer » Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:22 pm

stark wrote:
I didn't mean to imply that there was only one employer aspect of contorting my life, obviously sticking with one company for 34 years has other attributes as the path to management becomes easier, the salary goes from entry level to $100,000+ and the benefit package is overly rewarding when it seems like you have too much vacation time accrued on the books. The other choice of changing employers every couple of years just never seems worth it in the long run to me.



This is a big difference between the reality for young professionals now vs how it was for baby boomers - many young people don't have the choice to stay with a company for 30+ years. Job stability isn't what it was.

Companies are getting stingier with vacation time and other benefits, too. For example, at the company I've been with for 3 years now (not including the time I spent as an independent contractor working for them), I acrrue vacation at a decent rate but none of it carries over to the next year. The company stopped doing that about 5 years ago. With decreased benefits, there isn't as much company loyalty if the company doesn't actively try to retain their workers (my employer actually does a good job of that, especially in my department, which was bought out some years ago by this larger corporation but retains a bit of that smaller company feel). Add to that how much easier it is to advertise and recruit. My husband is an engineer with a phD and is contacted by recruiters regularly. He has his pick of jobs and it shows as he has moved around a bit more than I have. I actually want to stay with my employer for as long as possible.
User avatar
starrydreamer
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:51 am

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby Somnambulist » Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:46 pm

This is laughable..

Costs can be mitigated without capping doctors' salaries. Why does a sonogram cost my insurance company $5k in an ER but $300 in an office? Do you even look at your EOBs to see that insane difference in costs?
How can an office owned by a hospital be considered a satellite location and therefore charge a percentage more?

God, I wish I was born 70 years ago and be so far out of touch with reality as it is now. It's such a shame companies don't pay a liveable wage now.

Can't argue with Trump supporters though!
"Life's no piece of cake, mind you, but the recipe's my own to fool with."
Somnambulist
 
Posts: 7389
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby stark » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:07 pm

Somnambulist wrote:God, I wish I was born 70 years ago and be so far out of touch with reality as it is now.


I think the average age in the Senate is in their early 60's, that might be part of your problem.

Somnambulist wrote:It's such a shame companies don't pay a liveable wage now.


Just curious, going back as far as WWII.....what era did companies pay a liveable wage based on your standards of living?
I've found it easier to tear up tickets at 8/1 instead of 8/5.
stark
 
Posts: 3782
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:55 am
Location: SoCal

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby stark » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:22 pm

starrydreamer wrote: I acrrue vacation at a decent rate but none of it carries over to the next year. The company stopped doing that about 5 years ago. With decreased benefits......



Time out, gotta stop right there and make sure I understand.....a company that wants you to take your vacation the same year it's accrued, whether its for mental health reasons or the fact that you'll be making more in future years and paying you off costs them more, or their accountant said it's a liability we don't want to show on the books, whatever....do you really consider that to be a decrease in benefits?

Just fyi, everything I've read, most HR professionals have the opinion that taking vacation days is of extreme benefit as compared to saving them for next year, so go and enjoy!
I've found it easier to tear up tickets at 8/1 instead of 8/5.
stark
 
Posts: 3782
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:55 am
Location: SoCal

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby stark » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:30 pm

starrydreamer wrote: My husband is an engineer with a phD and is contacted by recruiters regularly. He has his pick of jobs and it shows as he has moved around a bit more than I have. I actually want to stay with my employer for as long as possible.


Obviously I have no idea what he does for a living but congrats on the education.
I'm guessing he moves so that his next paycheck will be higher?
Sometimes you'll see professional athletes do this too. Afterwards I've heard them lament their decision as they missed out on the growth of the prior team and watching them making it to the championship game.
Maybe some of the reward for your husband would be to have "skin in the game" and stay with a company while he sees a multi-year project to completion, got to be a lot of satisfaction in that. And if he's as valuable as you deserve, then I've got some faith in the employer that he'll be rewarded on an eventual payday.
I've found it easier to tear up tickets at 8/1 instead of 8/5.
stark
 
Posts: 3782
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:55 am
Location: SoCal

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby Somnambulist » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:30 pm

Aren't baby boomers the reason everything is awful right now?

Or your entitled parents were the reason everything is awful.. it's hard to remember..
"Life's no piece of cake, mind you, but the recipe's my own to fool with."
Somnambulist
 
Posts: 7389
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby BaroqueAgain1 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:43 pm

Don't look at me, a bona fide baby boomer. I worked for nearly four decades, paying my taxes, voting and generally trying to be a decent citizen. Now I watch my Social Security grow smaller, relative to cost of living, while sh!tholes in the government threaten to reduce my "entitlement."
Yeah, you know why I'm "entitled" to that money? Because I paid and paid and paid into SS. I'd have to live past 100 before I start getting money that isn't actually, you know, MINE. :evil:
BaroqueAgain1
 
Posts: 9252
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:16 pm

Re: The VENT Thread

Postby starrydreamer » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:52 pm

stark wrote:
starrydreamer wrote: I acrrue vacation at a decent rate but none of it carries over to the next year. The company stopped doing that about 5 years ago. With decreased benefits......



Time out, gotta stop right there and make sure I understand.....a company that wants you to take your vacation the same year it's accrued, whether its for mental health reasons or the fact that you'll be making more in future years and paying you off costs them more, or their accountant said it's a liability we don't want to show on the books, whatever....do you really consider that to be a decrease in benefits?

Just fyi, everything I've read, most HR professionals have the opinion that taking vacation days is of extreme benefit as compared to saving them for next year, so go and enjoy!


Yes, it is a decrease in benefits. My son gets sick and has to stay home enough that most of my vacation days go towards that (we get 5 paid sick days a year but that's not nearly enough for anyone with kids). That means I can't go on, for example, a two week trip to Japan to visit relatives because I don't have the option of stockpiling my days.

It costs a company more to recruit and hire new talent than it does to retain employees by doing things like allowing vacation time to be rolled over every two or theee years. I know most boomers feel that my generation thinks we're entitled to things, but this isn't that. I work hard to provide them with a quality product that I know they sell at a premium. Frankly, I could simply leave and go into practice (I'm a licensed attorney). My manager knows that, and so does upper management, and they do what they can to retain employees. The no vacation time carry over wasn't their decision.

As for my husband, he was at his last company for 3 years and worked his way up to supervisor, with a manager job lined up for him. He's making more now as a senior engineer without supervisor duties. He took a new job and we moved to a new state for a number of reasons that I don't need to share with you. Even people who change jobs every two years likely have a number of reasons for it. Again, the job environment just isn't what it was 50 or even 30 years ago.
User avatar
starrydreamer
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to Horsin' Around

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests